This crowd on earth they soon forget
The heroes of the past.
They cheer like mad until you fall,
And that's how long you last.
But God He never does forget,
And, in His Hall of Fame,
By just believing in his Son,
Inscribed you'll find your name.
Sunday, January 26, 2020
His Hall of Fame
Sunday, October 07, 2018
Georgia Tech bought by Adidas
The same day, I received the Fall 2018 issue of the Georgia Tech Alumni Magazine. Its cover included the teaser: "Inside the deal with Adidas." An article by Tony Rehagen provided the following details: over six years, Adidas will provide a total of $17.46 million worth of apparel and $1.2 million cash. (Adidas will give bonuses if the football team or men's basketball team appears in a championship game.) According to the article, "college athletics is big business."
And that includes branding. As part of the deal, Tech revamped the teams' uniforms (all featuring the Adidas logo), with a new color and new wordmark (here). The football helmet has a new version of the GT logo. The football team also got a renovated locker room that cost $4.5 million; of course, it features the Adidas logo also.
The men and women who play on these teams will also get workout gear to wear around campus. But they won't be compensated when Adidas or Georgia Tech sells replicas of their uniforms to students and fans, because of NCAA rules. The athletes' compensation is restricted by the NCAA, a cartel that exploits them and refuses to share the millions that it receives in various media and marketing deals (including deals for video games featuring players' likenesses, an issue in the O'Bannon lawsuit). The players have no association to represent them; they have no power except the power to opt out (which some do, working in professional leagues without playing for college teams).
Because of the NCAA, Adidas supposedly commits a crime when it gives money to high school athletes, but it is acceptable to give gear and money to the athletic departments who are recruiting and exploiting these athletes. The trial in New York is about people who broke NCAA rules, but the NCAA is the guilty party.
Saturday, April 26, 2014
Georgia Tech's Official Colors
Authorized colors are gold (PMS 124), navy (PMS 539), metallic gold (PMS 874), and black.
Thursday, February 13, 2014
Modeling the ski rental problem
In the ski rental problem, the decision-maker (let’s call him Joe) is going to spend multiple days skiing. He can purchase a pair of skis for a price of $K and use them one or more days (including the day on which he purchases the skis). He can also rent a pair of skis for one day for $1. (He won't rent skis if he has purchased some.) He can rent skis as many times as he wants. The critical assumption is that Joe has no idea how many days he will go skiing; he will ski until something stops him – an injury, bad weather, a loss of interest, or something urgent at home or work, for example – but he does not put a probability distribution on the number of days that he will ski.
What is interesting is that there are two ways to model the problem. The first model assumes that, before day 1, Joe will select a day (D) on which he will purchase skis if he is still skiing that day, but he will rent skis every day until then. Thus, if he skis a total of N days, then his total cost for skis equals N if N < D, and D – 1 + K if N >= D. This version seems to capture the risky nature of the decision. Selecting a small value of D is bad if N is only slightly larger than D; selecting a large value of D is bad if N is close to but not greater than D. (Small and large are relative to K.)
The second model considers the sequential nature of the problem: if Joe rented skis on the one day, then he has a decision to make the next day (rent again or purchase). Interestingly, there seems to be a memoryless property here: because Joe has no idea how many days he will ski, then he has no idea how many more days he will ski, so the decision on every day is the same. If he decides to rent a pair of skis on Day 1, he should rent a pair of skis every day, for there is no reason to change his choice. If, on any day, he would decide to purchase a pair of skis, then he should do that on Day 1. This would imply that Joe’s only reasonable choices are to purchase a pair of skis on Day 1 or never.
I suspect that I’ve run into a situation that occurs in other infinite-horizon sequential decisions. If so, I’d love to know which model is more reasonable and why.
Friday, May 10, 2013
Bryce Harper's swing
Tuesday, August 28, 2012
Sports and the Meaning of Life
Sunday, July 24, 2011
A Perfect Game
[Baseball] requires a whole constellation of seemingly bizarre physical and mental skills that, through countless barren millennia, were not only unrealized but also unsuspected potencies of human nature, silently awaiting the formal cause from beyond that would make them actual. So much of what a batter, pitcher, or fielder does is astonishingly improbable, and yet—it turns out—entirely natural. Clearly, baseball was always intended in our very essence; without it, our humanity was incomplete. Willie Mays was an avatar of the divine capacities that lie within our animal frames. Bob Feller’s fastball was Jovian lightning at the command of mortal clay.
He also compares it to the oblong game (football, soccer, basketball, etc.): "a contest played out on a rectangle between two sides, each attempting to penetrate the other’s territory to deposit some small object in the other’s goal or end zone."
Comparing baseball to even the most complex versions of the oblong game is like comparing chess to tiddlywinks.
Sunday, July 17, 2011
The soccer player who wants to be a priest
Tuesday, May 31, 2011
2011 Baseball predictions
Sunday, April 17, 2011
Scrabble Baseball Team
Saturday, April 09, 2011
A memorable game
Sunday, February 06, 2011
Monster Mini Golf
One of the holes had a spinner that randomly assigned you a handicap or advantage - I got "Tee off using the handle of the golf club," and Mike got "If you make a hole-in-one, score it as 0." The holes were generally easy (except the awful #17!), but I would have preferred more of the random penalties/awards to add some interest.
Hint: on Saturday get there early enough so that you start play before the birthday party groups do.
Tuesday, January 11, 2011
How to reform college football
Why does it need reform? Because it is "an illegitimate system in which nearly the half the top-level college football teams in the country were excluded before the first kickoff ever went up," she goes on to explain in another column today.
Saturday, October 02, 2010
The Bucs were rolling in 1979
Ah, Ricky Bell, Doug Williams, and the Selmon brothers...
Check out the cover or read an HTML version of the article.
The original article is on page 30 of the magazine (click on "View this issue").
Monday, September 06, 2010
Labor Day
Listened to part of the Nationals' 13-3 victory over the Mets on the way home.
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
Curling and operations research
Apparently I'm not the first: see the article by Kostuk and Willoughby on a long-running dispute in curling.
Bobby Cremins
"Bobby Cremins is still doing his thing at College of Charleston," The Washington Post, Sunday, February 21, 2010.
Tuesday, March 17, 2009
Seed Performance
Saturday, November 01, 2008
Great Day. Tech Wins. UGA gets crushed.
Great Day. Tech Wins. UGA gets crushed.
There's not much more to say!